Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

[Martin Dalecki]

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > > They released a supported ex-Cygnus people approved compiler.
> >
> > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial
> > compiler, with all the consequences I said.
> 
> And didnt you write something called pgcc once.

And then there isn't anything I could see which would prohibit anybody
from taking gcc-2.96 and ship it in any distro they wish too.
Alan you are in full right here the gcc-2.96 DOES a significantly
*better* job on in esp. C++ for example then any other gcc before - at 
least on the arch's which really matter those days. The PGCC never
really worked. In fact on TeX at least it generated worder 
code then the plain gcc-2.7.3 those day's....