Re: hdparm -d 1 fail test9-pre8

[Jeff Garzik]

On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> In order for hdparm -d 1 to work in test9-pre8, I had to reverse
> this change.  (Without being able to enable dma, performance here
> is muy el-stinko;-)  Is enabling dma manually now forbidden? (or
> am I maybe missing something else?)

If this change broke your DMA enabling, I think there are other bugs
lurking in the code...

Can you provide a "diff -u " of dmesg, output, with, and without the
change below?

	Jeff