Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?

John Anthony Kazos Jr. (jkazos@vt.edu)
Wed, 04 Oct 2000 04:28:41 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: FORT David: "2.4.0-test9USB related oops"
Previous message: Jerry Kelley: "acquiring resources shared or exclusive"
Next in thread: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Next in thread: Michael Meding: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Reply: Michael Meding: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Reply: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Reply: Kim Shepherd: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"

What does everyone have against gcc 2.95 on this list? I've been compiling kernels successfully (read: not one single (ever) error in compilation) with gcc 2.95.2 for more than a year now. What's the big deal?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: FORT David: "2.4.0-test9USB related oops"
Previous message: Jerry Kelley: "acquiring resources shared or exclusive"
Next in thread: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Next in thread: Michael Meding: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Reply: Michael Meding: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Reply: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Reply: Kim Shepherd: "Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"