Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2

Ralph Loader (
24 Feb 2001 15:47:01 +1300


> is very little interaction to start with. And the final AND that

> to the final size of the hash chain kills the high order bits.
> No good.

I didn't realise you were bit-masking down to the required size.

Yes, it would be pretty useless in that case.


> Andries

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at