Re: [PATCH] ALSA update [6/10] - 2002/07/20

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:22:54 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre8-ac1 unresolved"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2"
In reply to: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA update [6/10] - 2002/07/20"

From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@fenrus.demon.nl>
Date: 29 Sep 2002 21:12:23 +0200

what is wrong with the PCI DMA API that makes ALSA wants a private
interface/implementation ?

It makes the layers not have to know what the BUS is, and this can all
be deleted when everything goes through a generic struct device and
assosciated OPS.

I think ALSA is definitely doing the right thing here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre8-ac1 unresolved"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2"
In reply to: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA update [6/10] - 2002/07/20"