>It seems useful to me add a colum with CPU%+LCPU%.
>It is intersting to notice that 2.5.41 spend 41+9=50% CPU time
>for compiling and for the io_load while 2.5.42 spend 45+9=54%
>time. Can I say that 2.5.42 is "better" than 2.5.41 ?
No I'm afraid not. The lcpu% cant estimate accurately the cpu% used by the
load while the kernel is actually being compiled as the load starts before
ther kernel compilation and ends after it. This means that lcpu% will always
overestimate the loads' cpu%. I haven't found a workaround for this... yet
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9qLUdF6dfvkL3i1gRAmS/AJ49q1Kd1RBZU8bflVd2n5RUi1Q3UQCffNZI
8V14Cm2/xbXk/QMCCoBnIf4=
=/fVc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/