Re: [BUG] 2.5.62 kmod rewrite broke modprobe's install command

Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:52:18 +1100


In message <200302231300.h1ND04Ch008890@harpo.it.uu.se> you write:
> The reason this happens is that in 2.5.62, modprobe is started
> with SIGCHLD set to SIG_IGN and not blocked. The "install"
> command is run by system(), but due to SIGCHLD being SIG_IGN,
> the child (which terminates quickly) is reaped automatically.
> The parent process (modprobe) does a wait or waitpid, which fails
> with ECHILD since the child is already gone. system() returns -1,
> and modprobe logs a fatal error.

Yes. Fixed below.

Thanks for the report!
Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

Name: Enable signals for usermode helpers Author: Linus Torvalds Status: Experimental

D: Stelian Pop reported that all signals are blocked in processes D: execed from the kernel as usermode helpers.

diff -urpN --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.62-bk6/kernel/kmod.c working-2.5.62-bk6-usermode-sig/kernel/kmod.c --- linux-2.5.62-bk6/kernel/kmod.c 2003-02-18 11:18:57.000000000 +1100 +++ working-2.5.62-bk6-usermode-sig/kernel/kmod.c 2003-02-24 12:18:55.000000000 +1100 @@ -152,6 +152,14 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data; int retval; + /* Unblock all signals. */ + flush_signals(curtask); + flush_signal_handlers(curtask); + spin_lock_irq(&curtask->sighand->siglock); + sigemptyset(&curtask->blocked); + recalc_sigpending(); + spin_unlock_irq(&curtask->sighand->siglock); + retval = -EPERM; if (current->fs->root) retval = execve(sub_info->path, sub_info->argv,sub_info->envp); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/