Re: ->direct_IO API change in current 2.4 BK

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com)
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:18:47 -0400


On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 11:51:48AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jul 09, 2003 20:29 +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > How about instead following Alan's suggestion to replace
> > KERNEL_HAS_O_DIRECT with a KERNEL_HAS_O_DIRECT2 that can be used to
> > switch between the old and new O_DIRECT format in the XFS patches?
>
> Actually, I like that a lot more, as it allows out-of-tree code to
> know which interface to use, and we don't have to key on kernel version
> (which is bogus if compiling against a vendor kernel that back-ports
> this fix).

Feature test macros are definitely quite useful...

...but making the stable series VFS API definition _conditional_
is quite unprecedented, and IMO wrong.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/